Uri Avnery press release on the detention of New Profile activists

2009 April 27
by Alex

“The police assault on activists of ‘New Profile’ and ‘The Center for the Defence of the Individual’,  the detention  of activists, among them grandmothers, and confiscation of computers constitutes a severe attack on the Freedom of Speech in Israel” warns Uri Avnery of the Gush Shalom movement. “The activity of New Profile – an organization which opposes  the militarism of Israeli society and gives counseling  to Conscientious Objectors – is considered by the police to be  ‘incitng to shirking’  – a severe legal charge.

 

Just a few weeks have passed since the Netanyahu-Lieberman government took office (or should one say Lieberman-Netanyahu) – and already a brute offensive is launched against the adherents of peace and democracy.  Indeed, the appointment of  the new Minister of Police was from the ranks of the party headed by Lieberman.

 

Details from the New Profile press release:

 

This morning police descended upon the homes of  activists in New Profile, a feminist movement whose proclaimed aim is “civil-ization of society in Israel” and “opposition to the undue influence of the military on daily life”. Five activists were detained and interrogated in the Ramat Hachiyal Police Station. Amongst those interrogated: Analeen Kish, aged 70, a ceramics artist, daughter of a family of the “Righteous among the Nations” who converted to Judaism after her marriage to Holocaust survivor Dr. Eldad Kish, active in organizations of Dutch Holocaust survivors in Israel. Additionally detained for interrogation were Amir Givol, a resident of Jerusalem, Sergei Sandler, a resident of Be’er Sheva, and Roni Barkan, a resident of Tel Aviv.

The computers of all those interrogated were taken by the police, as were computers belonging to their partners and children – in once case the computer of a fourth grade pupil, the daughter of one of those interrogated. The computers of family members were returned after the activists were released on bail.

 

All five were interrogated station in the Yarkon Region of the police. At the conclusion of the interrogation they were released on bail and under “limiting conditions” – in particular, a prohibition upon making contact with other members of the movement during the next 30 days, which implies a severe disruption and partial paralysis of its activities.

 

Also raided were the offices of the  ‘The Center for the Defence of the Individual’ in East Jerusalem – an organization mainly involved in helping Palestinians who encounter difficulties with the military government’s bureaucracy. The police tried to confiscate the Center’s computers too. Center activists refused toi hand them over, as much of the material in these computers was given to its lawyers as part of a lawyer-client relations, which police is not entitled to access.

 

Attorney Smadar Ben Nathan, who is representing New Profile, said that the investigation of the police is focusing on the website of New Profile, which has links to other sites on the internet. Ben Nathan added that the New Profile Movement is a recognized non-profit association which acts openly and publicly, in accordance with the law, and the use of a criminal investigation in this context is invalid and exaggerated, and stands in opposition to freedom of expression.

 

New Profile had stated that the police acts confirm what they had been contending for many years,. i.e. that the militarization Israeli society  harms the sacred principles of democracy, freedom of expression and freedom of political association, and that those who believed that criminal charges are only trumped up “only” against Arab citizens of Israel saw this morning that none of us can be certain that s/he can freely express a dissident opinion. Other peace groups can only concur. 
 

Contact: Uri Avnery 0505-306440, Adam Keller, 03-5565804 or 0506-709603

Dr. Diana Dolev: 052 872 8300; Attorney Smadar Ben Nathan, 052 358 9775

Ofra Leith:  050 552 4372; Eilat Maoz, Women’s Coalition for Peace, 050 857 5729

From abroad: replace first 0 by +972

10 Comments leave one →
2009 April 27

I got an email from Jewish Voice for Peace about this. Good to see corroboration here…

2009 April 27
Avram permalink

Alex – by any chance do you know if Uri Avnery was at all disturbed when many teenage girls, some below the age of 14, were thrown into jail for protesting the disengagement? Or is he only concerned with ‘his’ democracy?

“Saw this morning that none of us can be certain that s/he can freely express a dissident opinion”

They must have missed the disengagement too …

I remember a few months after 9/11, two of my Iraqi friends (one a Jew, the other a Muslim) had their computers confiscated by federal agents. Both, while unhappy ‘they’ were targeted, got their computers back and nothing whatsoever happened to them.

If New Profile have nothing to hide (ie, they don’t also encourage and pursue avenues of promoting “Objectors”), then they shouldn’t have to worry … I fully understand there’s segments of our population that cannot do the army for varying reasons (be it mental or physical health, religion – well I don’t get this one but that’s another discussion, security concerns etc) – but if this group was in any way promoting it, then that’s wrong. Surely you agree with that Alex?

2009 April 27

No idea what Avneri said about anti-disengagement protesters…

While I believe that every Israeli (Jew, Arab, male, female, straight, gay) should serve int he army, I don’t think it should be illegal to openly support not serving in the army…

2009 April 27
Avram permalink

“No idea what Avneri said about anti-disengagement protesters…”

You mind calling him and asking? :)

“I don’t think it should be illegal to openly support not serving in the army”

I don’t think it should be illegal to ‘push’ for a state where not all the citizens need to serve – though I don’t agree with that. However, if they promote & advertise ways to get out of the army, then I think they’ve crossed the lines …

2009 April 28
Gabriel permalink

“While I believe that every Israeli (Jew, Arab, male, female, straight, gay) should serve int he army, I don’t think it should be illegal to openly support not serving in the army…”As Avram said, it depends on whether they give support to these people or they teach them ways to get around signing up. They are two very different things.

“none of us can be certain that s/he can freely express a dissident opinion”

is certainly an exaggeration. I think we need to wait and see with this one.

2009 April 28

Avram – the fact that right-wing protesters’ rights get violated does not justify the same treatment to Leftists. One should fight for freedom of speech for both sides. I don’t know about Avneri, but the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, who is often criticized for being too leftist – people like to call it “the Association for Palestinians’ Rights – deals regularly with the arrest of right-wing minors. Here is an example from the disengagement days:

http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3182883,00.html

2009 April 28
Avram permalink

“the fact that right-wing protesters’ rights get violated does not justify the same treatment to Leftists”

I didn’t say that … but I just don’t like Avnery (or the left wing’s stance in general) that ‘democracy’ is only violated when they think their rights are violated. Thanks for the link though, it’s nice to see some organizations care about ‘people’, not just about ‘people with their political leanings’.

2009 April 28
Avram permalink

“One should fight for freedom of speech for both sides”

Such a slippery slope … but to be honest, I didn’t say I was opposed to their rights to say what they want, I said:

“I don’t think it should be illegal to ‘push’ for a state where not all the citizens need to serve – though I don’t agree with that. However, if they promote & advertise ways to get out of the army, then I think they’ve crossed the lines ”

The last sentence is why I think the police went after them …

2009 April 28

Avram – I don’t think they should be able to help people cheat their way out of army service, but if they want to openly promote refusal, that’s fine with me.

2009 April 28
Avram permalink

I guess we basically agree …

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS