Everybody be Cool: Notes on a Counter-Demonstration

2009 March 24
by Alex

umm-el-fahm-009

If everyone behaves like Fonzie nobody gets hurt. Having taken a day off work to stand against the fascism of Baruch Marzel and Itamar Ben-Gvir in Umm-el-Fahm, this was my hope against hope. Our bus was cheered as it arrived in town, our gesture of solidarity appreciated by the town’s men-folk (for it was, mostly, men-folk), the gentle claps of a cricket match rather than the whoops of a street-battle, perhaps a sign of how strange we all seemed to the town’s residents, or perhaps – I thought – a signal of the peaceful opposition that was to follow. The bus was organised by Peace Now, but there were also members of Meretz and Hadash there, everyone in bed together for the day, although Labour members were notable in their absence, no doubt getting ready for the big vote to decide whether or not to enter the government later this evening.

As we came down the hill with our banners and our sloganeering (“Jews and Arabs refuse to be enemies”, “Fascism won’t pass”), I became aware of a clear division among the protesters already in place. On one side Israeli-Arab men, some with Palestinian flags, many in keffiyehs, pastiches of their counterparts in the territories or abroad. On the other side Jews and Arabs, Zionists and anti-Zionists and non-Zionists, earnestly shouting the shouts of peace, holding banners up high. This was the welcome the 100 far-rightists could expect.

If fascists marched through my parents’ neighbourhood in London, I’d expect that non-Jews would oppose them. This is why I came to Umm-el-Fahm. I try to be a libertarian, and I think the Supreme Court took the correct decision in permitting the march, but in doing so it also implicitly gave people the right to stand in opposition, and this is the reason I came. Baruch Marzel thinks he’s oh-so-clever, asking what’s wrong with him marching through sovereign Israeli territory with the sovereign Israeli flag. Needless to say, he won’t be taking a similar march through Mea Sharim, another place known for its ambivalence bordering on antipathy for Zionism.

I have little time for the Balad-style nationalism or Islamism that some people suggest is dominant in Umm-el-Fahm. But I’m aware of the context. Having visited the city I found that our government has done precious little to win hearts and minds in places like this, and that only when I am confident we are doing everything we can to fully integrate Israeli-Arabs into the broader polity will I feel comfortable chastising Israeli-Arabs when they demonstrate hostility against the state. By standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the people of Umm-el-Fahm, then, I hoped to show Marzel and his clique that they were hopelessly outnumbered and that Israeli-Arabs could count on Jewish support when threatened by fascism.

We arrived at 8:45; the march was scheduled to kick off at 9:30. We stood around in the steadily increasing rain, the border police looking on, everyone ready to play their part in the pantomime. The march was only permitted on the minor roads of the town, but nobody seemed to know what the final route would be, or if the demonstrators would even march past the main rump of the counter-protest. I ducked into a restaurant to buy some cashews, unsurprised to see it defy the municipal calls for a general strike. “This is great for business,” I joked to the owner. “You should ask Marzel to come back every week!” “If only,” he replied with a wink.

Now the rain was really beating down fast, emboldening everybody, as if they had never seen water fall from the sky before. A heavy shudder of thunder got everyone jumping like the beat dropping at a rave; anticipation was suddenly on everyone’s faces. But still no sign of Marzel. By now it was clear that he wouldn’t be coming round our way; people began hitching lifts up the hill to seek him out, but I only realised this was happening before it was too late. That’s right; I came all the way to Umm-el-Fahm to oppose fascism and didn’t even manage to find one of the fascists, apart from maybe two Neturei Karta members with predictable provocations about Zionism on their banners.

There was some trouble at our end though; a couple of people arrested, the tensions ratcheted up a notch or two, teenagers running off up the hill as if on a mission. Later I found out that there had been 28 injuries, mainly policemen, plus a Meretz MK who I had earlier seen smoking a cigarette, like Fonzie, enjoying the attention of the crowd. The best response to the provocative march would have been to stand loudly but peacefully in opposition, to avoid the temptation to spill over into low-level violence, to set an example that others might follow. The divisions between Jew and Arab in this country – not to mention the divisions among members of the Israeli left – meant this wasn’t possible. Fonzie’s dictum wasn’t followed, and I once again left a political gathering in disappointment, this time unsure whether to return, frankly no longer seeing the point of it all.

29 Comments leave one →
2009 March 24
Hazel permalink

Of course this has gone on in Northern Ireland for decades, it’s called the marching season, where the Protestants set out to deliberately annoy the Catholics by marching through their areas. You don’t hear so much of it now.

Does Um el Fahm really mean mother of coal and if so why?

It’s good you went.

Hazel

2009 March 24

Yes, it does, something to do with a nearby quarry I think.

2009 March 24

Wait, I don’t understand why people got arrested and what the tension was over if there weren’t any fascists around. Did leftists start fighting with other leftists? Please explain.

I really wanted to make it to the protest but had to be a corporate drone for the day. Guess I didn’t miss much.

Also, did the fascist march happen or not? Did they just not show up? I do not understand.

2009 March 24

Hey May, It did happen – it took about an hour although it was in another part of town. The people were arrested in scuffles with police; no idea if they came close to the protesters.
A

2009 March 24

Nice report. I’ll link to it in the body of my own post. Always good to get an inside perspective. Too bad you didn’t find the fascists though…

2009 March 24

“[...] only when I am confident we are doing everything we can to fully integrate Israeli-Arabs into the broader polity will I feel comfortable chastising Israeli-Arabs when they demonstrate hostility against the state.”

That would be your right. Can a state however ever demand ‘loyalty’? Of course extreme cases of hostility cannot be tolerated but demanding ‘loyalty’ goes much further than that. Is the citizen of any state somehow bound to be loyal to that state? Is non-violent / non-criminal dissent not one of the best guarantees against a slide into totalitarianism?

Equality includes the right to protest, even ‘for’ the ‘wrong’ cause…

Hard to see also how Israeli Arabs could ever feel comfortable with a state that’s responsible for the suffering of so many of their brethren in the O/T.

2009 March 24

Well there’s a difference between chastising and demanding.
I don’t think a state can ever demand loyalty, but – as you say – extreme cases of hostility (i.e. supporting/abetting the use of violence against the state) cannot be tolerated.

2009 March 25

Alex – would you oppose other people (with no Kach affiliation) marching in an Israeli city (which Umm el-Fahem is) , waving Israeli flags?

2009 March 25

Clearly just the site of an Israeli flag or the presence of a few Zionist Jews is enough to cause a riot among the arabs. This tells us that nothing could be more compassionate than returning each and every one of these misplaced souls to a land where islam is the official religion, arabic the official language, Judaism is strictly forbidden, and Zionism non-existent.

Sending every one of these raging, seething, hostile, distraught arabs to a proper home would be the sweetest of all gifts, and obviously the sincerest way of winning their hearts and minds. Jews like Marzel and Ben-Ari are among the compassionate few Israelis who truly understand the arabs, and realize they are prideful, religious, nationalist people, and wish to live in a country that reflects their culture to call home. Sending them to such a place may sound bleeding heart Utopian, but if we truly care about peace and the well being of the suffering arab people we will work towards making that dream a reality.

Unfortunately, hugs and expressions of sympathy alone will not be enough. What needs to be done is much deeper, more profound, and more caring. If each and everyone of us who cares about the plight of theses arabs offers to help sponsor the transfer of an offended, humiliated, angry moslem family that’s trapped living in the Jewish State, we can begin to create a future where all people will have a true homeland to call their own and enjoy the fruits of self-determination.

How long must we look at the hopeless, sad faces of the Israeli arabs, who remain stuck in a country that represents everything they hate. We can help them find their way out to a meaningful life if we are willing to invest our time and money. Join me in becoming a light among the nations, and offer to give whatever you can to help transfer a poor arab family to any one of 22 surrounding islamic nations where they can assimilate without having to suffer the indignity of seeing Jews marching down their streets with Magen David flags and speaking Hebrew.

It’s never too late to do the right thing. Give peace a chance.

2009 March 25

“once again left a political gathering in disappointment, this time unsure whether to return, frankly no longer seeing the point of it all.”

I’ve felt the exactly the same after some left-wing demos, wondering what tangible outcome was achieved by the banners and slogans. At the very least, it shows that there is a movement in Israel (however battered and bruised) that still believes in a brighter future for the country.

If you’re presence showed the Arabs of Um el-Fahm, not to mention the Israeli and international media, that there Israelis willing to take a day off work a spend it running around in the rain, then there was a point to it all.

2009 March 25

But where were you Ranks?

2009 March 25

LB – I didn’t oppose the march because of the Israeli flags; I opposed it because of the transferist politics, sweetly embodied above by MadZionist.

2009 March 25

I’ll be on the next one – and so will you!

2009 March 25
Avram permalink

Alex
- Do you oppose the threats, that have been sent to the Attorny General, made against the right wing marchers? If those same threats were made against the gay pride marchers, do you think you’d feel differently?
- I think this ‘incitement rallies’ (be it these extreme right wingers, or the Gay Pride rally in Jerusalem, or the recent march by Palestinians in Jerusalem) only harm the fragile internal stability of this country. Marzel and co better not complain about a Gay Pride march in Jerusalem …
- Were there any Israeli flags in your crowd? Or like the ‘Anti-war’ marches in Tel Aviv, those were banned? I think this is rather sad but I guess is ‘incitement’
- If Liverpool win the league, can we organize a co-existence bash for all Reds in Israel?

2009 March 25

Avraham,
I’m a libertarian, so long as it is feasible. So I oppose violent threats no matter the context.
If by recent march by Palestinians in Jerusalem you mean the Arabic Capital of Culture stuff, I’d have to disagree with you.
There was only one Israeli flag alongside a Palestinian flag, this lack disappointed me.
Amen to the post-title celebrations if Stevie G & Co can pull it off…

2009 March 25

Alex – But if I simply walked down the street, not saying anything, and waved an Israeli flag – what would you say? and to be honest – what would happen to me?

2009 March 25

LB – depends what street you choose.

You can wave to your heart’s content down my road in west Jerusalem, but I wouldn’t try your luck down Mea Shearim, Ramallah or, for that matter, many parts of Britain.

2009 March 25

Mike – but you should be – and I don’t see too many people protesting that. On the other, to remain the contrarian – PLO/PNA/Palestinian flags are routinely waved in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem…

2009 March 25
Avram permalink

” So I oppose violent threats no matter the context.”

sababa

“There was only one Israeli flag alongside a Palestinian flag, this lack disappointed me.”

Only ONE Palestinian flag too? That is surprising – the one Israeli flag is one more than I expected.

“If by recent march by Palestinians in Jerusalem you mean the Arabic Capital of Culture stuff, I’d have to disagree with you”

It’s incitement … Call a spade a spade. It’s not their capital (at least not yet) and the march, no matter what its ‘real’ aim is, will piss off people needlessly …

“Amen to the post-title celebrations if Stevie G & Co can pull it off…”

I’ll even buy you the first Carlsberg.

2009 March 25

LB – I don’t know; let’s do it.

Avram – there were a bunch of Palestinian flags. As for the incitement stuff, we’ll have to agree to disagree.
A

2009 March 25

LB – Your last post was unclear. I assume you mean I “should be” waving Israeli flags in anti-Zionist strongholds? I think I’ll leave the unnecessary provocations to Marzel et al…

“PLO/PNA/Palestinian flags are routinely waved in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem…”

It’s very rare to see such flags hung publicly in east Jerusalem since the Israeli authorities usually take them down. Last Saturday, police forcibly prevented Palestinians from holding cultural events in Jerusalem to mark the city as “Capital of Arab Culture for 2009″.

2009 March 25

Aaaahh, ain’t that cute, Alex has got his own in-house transferist troll. I used to have one too (funnily enough, he called himself “Mad Zionist” too). The inverted humanitarianism of these people is breathtaking. It’s worthwhile asking if some Nazis didn’t think like that about European Jews too, before they figured out (Wannsee) that resettling an estimated 11 million would be, erm… impractical?

This is of course the biggest problem with ‘transfer’, it cannot be done without use of excessive force.

2009 March 25
Tony B lonely permalink

Well Alex
Islamo-fascist have been marching repeatedly through London and other parts of UK with extreme racist incitement and violence, shouting “Bomb Bomb Israel – Wipe Out Wipe out Israel”, attacking police, trying to storm the Israeli Embassy, smashing shops Starbucks etc in High St Kensington
Is also occuring in Scandinavia and Continental Europe (Paris and Stockholm)
Why don’t you and your pals in Peace Now whatever get over here to the real frontline instead of tilting at windmills and soft targets in Israel?
What a load of self-righteous puffery.
Sorry but the funniest and most insightful piece of writing on the blog was from the mad Zionist. He is spot on even if I may not agree 100% with what he says
Regards
Tony
See links below

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7930940.stm

http://www.hurryupharry.org/2009/03/09/when-an-israeli-played-tennis-in-sweden/

2009 March 26
Margaret permalink

Madzionist – I recognize that many feel the US to have little reason to serve as an example to others, yet the experience of segregation was well tested there and the lessons to be drawn from it’s failure are of a multitude. Basically it only works if society accepts extreme repression, which is not healthy for living things.

I would suggest that ‘peace’ is not a worthwhile goal if it requires ignoring questions of equality, which segregation does, being a conclusion that what is different needs to be separated to avoid the enmity resulting from inequality.

Besides which “Clearly just the site of an Israeli flag or the presence of a few Zionist Jews is enough to cause a riot among the arabs.” not only is not clearly a conclusion that is supportable but is one highly questionable, and a statement so general as to be insupportable on that basis alone.

2009 March 27

Margaret, I agree that segregation is untenable. If you got the impression that I think it is a good idea to force arabs to stay in Israel living as resident aliens it was not my intention. I think the problem that we have here is the misunderstanding that being Jewish is the nationality, religion, culture, and identity of the citizens of the Jewish State of Israel. If one is to be a citizen of such a state, reason dictates that one must be Jewish.

You see, I understand that the arabs will feel like outcasts in a society like this, and would not for a minute expect them by and large to like or accept it. In the war for independence, had the arabs been victorious and imposed an islamic society I would not for a minute expect the Jews to feel a part of that culture, either.

You see, the misunderstanding many people have is the nature of Judaism. It is more than a nationality, a religion, a culture, or a language. However, it is not a race, and unlike segregation where people were judged by the color of their skin, being Jewish is accomplished by converting and adopting the Jewish identity. Any arab could do so, but obviously nearly none want to since they have their own culture, society and religion they want to advance.

Out of love and compassion for the arabs, I wish to relocate them to a land in which they will not be forced to live with humiliation, anger and feeling like a foreigner in there own country. By giving them a home that reflects their society, language, lifestyle and religion we are giving them hope, happiness, peace and dignity.

2009 March 27

Sorry, meant to say that being Jewish IS a nationality, religion, culture, and identity.

2009 March 28
Margaret permalink

You seem to be saying that ethnicity is an aspect of culture that divides people so completely that they cannot be happy living together. It is a view that has been tested within the US and found to be without basis, as well as detrimental to the well-being of society. It also is counter-indicated by the history of the region that now is the Israel/Palestine Territory.

However, it is possible to create states on such a basis. Maintaining them, as Israel has demonstrated, requires constant military intervention.

2009 March 28

Tony – because I live in Israel. So I’m naturally more concerned about things that happen here than things that happen in Europe.

2009 March 29

Tony: Thanks for the props.

Margaret: Please reread what I’ve written and adjust your responses so they fit the context of the discussion. You continue to inject your predetermined notions in place of my words, and then build a fictitious argument with yourself that suits your view of events. I believe they call this a “Strawman” tactic, but the way that term gets overused I am reluctant to casually toss it about. I have not said that ethnicity is the definition of a Jewish society, in fact I have strongly argued against such shallow pigeonholing, and if you would take the time to read what I actually am saying you would realize this.

I am an activist for Jewish nation having the right to self determination. I am American and Jewish, and in order to become an American citizen one must be either birthright American, or be able to pass tests that show you have successfully “converted” to being legally American. This may be upsetting to those who would like to see a world order without boundaries, but every country on earth today requires those who become citizens to successfully pass tests of loyalty and knowledge of that nation they wish to become a member of.

Therefore, by the same measure, in order for one to become a citizen of a Jewish State, one similarly must be able to demonstrate that they are indeed birthright Jewish or have successfully “converted” to being legally Jewish. To say otherwise is simply a double standard and a matter of bigotry against the Jewish people.

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS