Israeli Apathy (1): An Introduction

2008 November 23
by Alex

Friday night, on my way back from Jaffa with CZ, I decided to walk into the cliche and talk to the taxi-driver about politics. You know what’s meant to happen next: lots of xenophobia and flag-raising, judgements instantly disappearing into the night air like the cigarette smoke from the driver’s mouth. This is how liberals indulge themselves everywhere, isn’t it? 

I asked Yossi who he was planning to vote for in the upcoming elections. “None of them, they’re all a bunch of shits,” he told me. Now fifty years of age, he had voted for various parties over the years, but hadn’t voted in any of the recent polls. “They only look out for themselves. The day they start caring about me, I’ll start voting. Now, though, it doesn’t make a difference.” I argued that it does make a difference, even if only a small one, and that it is perhaps elections like February’s – the ones which attract little interest – which end up being significant. He was not moved. “I don’t know how long you’ve been here,” he told me, “but you’ll soon learn.”

On reflection, this was another cliche. The idea that the democratic process makes no difference is a common one. What’s sad is how quickly and recently the idea has taken root in Israel, a country known for its robust participatory politics. Even more interesting is how this apathising process has gone almost unnoticed, despite the close attention Israel receives around the world. Israel is seen as some ideological relic, a place where decisions are made because of absurd attachments to nineteenth century notions like blood and land, a state where the national ideology – Zionism – drives policy and leads to war or peace.

Somewhere along the way, though, Israelis just started watching Big Brother. And that, in a nutshell, was that. We’re not quite at the stage where the latest developments in the programme will make the front page of the newspaper (although you shouldn’t quote me on that), but reality television does now seem more important to us than the driving false dichotomy of Israeli political history: peace or security.

An opinion poll published this week bears this out. According to Haaretz, only 51 percent of every Jewish 18-35 year old (rates of political participation in the Arab sector are difference; hence the usefulness of surveying them separately) are sure that they will vote in the February elections; 69 percent of the same age bracket think most politicians are corrupt. Those who are certain they won’t vote give a number of reasons: it doesn’t interest me, it’s not important to me, there’s nobody to vote for, I don’t believe in anyone…

More cliches, then. And were I in Britain, I might have more sympathy. The first-past-the-post system is one in which millions of votes are rendered redundant; in such circumstances, apathy becomes almost inevitable. In Israel, however, we have proportional representation, a system not without its flaws, but one in which nobody can say that their voice won’t be heard.  Despite this, I’m going to stick my neck out and predict that February will see the lowest turnout in Israeli history. The considered cynicism of the taxi-driver, borne of experience, has become second-nature to the nation’s youth, a development which favours only the right, hence Likud’s lead in the polls.

I’ll be voting in the elections (assuming that the rumours that olim can only vote three years after arrival aren’t true), but I know I’ve been as apathetic as anyone in the last year or two. Consider this series on Israeli Apathy an attempt to rouse myself out of the stupour, to audaciously hope that Bibi Netanyahu will not be the next Prime Minister of Israel, and that change is not far away…

6 Comments leave one →
2008 November 27
Paul Frosh permalink

Good post. On the Big Brother issue, an interesting factoid is that the list of top rated TV programs at the moment is populated pretty heavily by reality tv shows (Big Brother, Mifratz Ha’ahava) and traditional factual programmes (the news, Uvdah): http://www.rashut2.org.il/about_survey_rating_week.asp.
In fact, apart from the weekly consumer affairs ‘expose’ programme “Colbotech”, only the hugely expensive and massively hyped Big Brother beats Channel 2 news, and the rating for the latter is a weekly average (i.e. it’s consistently high). This is pretty unusual compared to the US and many European countries. And it may be positive evidence of the residual public engagement of Israelis. On the other hand, who says that watching the news is a good indicator of political involvement? It may even encourage the kind of cynicism and indifference you describe.

2008 November 27

Hi Paul – thanks for the comment. Interesting point about ratings for television news. Personally, aside from football and my internet downloads of Doctor Who, I don’t watch television at all, which means that lots of contemporary Israeli culture is sadly passing me by. I don’t know what the high ratings mean, but I do think that television news is generally a poor way of keeping informed, at least in isolation. So I think we have to compare how television news viewing forms part of people’s broader consumption of media.

2008 November 27
Paul Frosh permalink

Don’t know if this is for the comment space, but funny you should call for a comparison of how tv news forms part of people’s broader consumption of media – and how it encourages/discourages public engagment. That’s exactly what I’m going to be researching over the next couple of years (Hebrew U plus Israel Democracy Institute)!
I’m way behind on Doctor Who (watch it on Yes) – still pining for Rose Tyler.

2008 November 27

I thought that was your field, wasn’t sure precisely what though. Feel free to share any preliminary findings from your research with a Guest Dichotomies! In terms of the good Doctor, the most relevant episode to your research is The Long Game from series one (of the revived series), featuring the Editor and the Might Jagrafess. Once you get to Series 3, though, it’s worth thinking about how the Master goes about manipulating his public. Certainly worth an epigraph or two…As for Rose, don’t worry, she’ll be back…

2008 November 27
Paul Frosh permalink

Thanks for the Dr Who guidance. Now I’m totally lost. I’ll pass the info on to my 12 year-old daughter for decoding.
Will be happy to share any premilinary results from the media consumtion project. Don’t hold your breath though (academic research: so thorough, so slow).

2008 December 29
stephen hoffman permalink

i dont agree with first past the post but the national list system in 1 word is rubbish , it leads to unstable coalitions where small parties be them far left or far right holds the government to ransom and encourages back room deals which leads to corruption- fueling apathy -also if a government is in power on average for only 2 years they cant get much done .

the best system from my perspective as a politics student is the ams system used by germany this is a hybrid system of first past the post and proportional representation – so you have the benefits of a clear winner first past the post , with the benefits of proportional representation-every vote counts.

Leave A Comment

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS